Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Lusk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramos et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Armando Ramos, Albert Ferreira, Cynthia Fountain and others
Defendant:
Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Vazzano et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Thomas Vazzano, Brandon Lee, Khatilen Lee and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Holdings (Americas), Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06103
Plaintiff:
James P. Lusk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10460
Plaintiff:
William Johnson, Victor Jones, David Kenney and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Lusk v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Lusk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lusk v. McNamee et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Michael Connors, John Privitera, Simon Ballam and others
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Marie Lusk
Lusk et al v. Serve U Brands, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv06451
Plaintiff:
Skyler Lusk , Tia Council , Viktoria O'Brien and others
Defendant:
Serve U Brands, Inc. , Insomnia Cookies, LLC and Seth Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nowlin v. 2 jane doe female
as 17-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quintin A. Nowlin
Defendant - Appellee:
Monroe County Sherriff, City of Rochester Police Department, City of Rochester and others
Defendant:
Rochester Police Officers, surveillance and back up, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Attorney and others
Lusk et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Lusk and Sarah Jane Lusk
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
