Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cibula, et al. vs. Columbia Gas Transmissions, LLC, et al.
as 4:2012cv01553
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and NiSource Energy Ventures, LLC
Plaintiff:
James H. Cibula , Lisa M. Cibula , Mark Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Jane Lyder, et al
as 10-35916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LYDER, Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Department of Interior, KENNETH SALAZAR and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Jane Lyder, et al
as 10-35863
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANE LYDER, Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Department of Interior, KENNETH SALAZAR and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Green v. Central Office Review
as 10-3073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy, Kenneth McLaughlin and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Lyder et al
as 9:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and others
Defendant:
Jane Lyder, Kenneth Salazar and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Green v. Central Office Review Committee et al
as 1:2007cv04536
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Central Office Review Committee, Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
