Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Dossett v. Sysco Jackson, LLC
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Lyman Dossett
Defendant:
Sysco Jackson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lyman v. Titan Gas, LLC
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maxx Lyman
Defendant:
Titan Gas, LLC d/b/a Cleansky Energy
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lyman v. Globe Life Inc.
as 4:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Maxx Lyman
Defendant:
Globe Life Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Spalding
as 23-10544
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 23-10268
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent / Appellee:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Spalding v. Warden of FCI El Reno
as 3:2023cv00961
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Warden of FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Spalding v. NLN (3:23-cv-285)
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
NFN NLN (3:23-cv-285), Coleen Peters, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
