Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Canton Port Services LLC v. M/V Indigo Spica
as 3:2023cv06048
Plaintiff:
Canton Port Services LLC
Defendant:
M/V Indigo Spica
Claimant:
IMS Maritime SA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hawthorne Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ratu Shipping Co. SA
as 23-1230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HAWTHORNE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC., for its own Account as Consignee of Certain Cargo and as Authorized Agent for Genesis Products Inc., GENESIS PRODUCTS INC., GREAT LAKES LAMINATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RATU SHIPPING CO. SA and RATU SHIPPING CO. SA, as claimant to the M/V TAC IMOLA, IMO No. 9932103 her engines, boilers, tackle, etc., in rem
Defendant:
M/V TAC IMOLA, IMO No. 9932103 her engines, boilers, tackle, etc, NISSHIN SHIPPING COMPANY, LIMITED, FLEET MANAGEMENT LTD-HKG and others
Garnishee:
MASTER OF THE M/V INDIGO SPICA, MASTER OF THE M/V TAC IMOLA, FAR EAST AMERICAN, INC., W&W Pacific Holdings Inc. and others
Hawthorne Industrial Products Inc. v. M/V Indigo Spica (IMO No. 9708758) et al
as 1:2022cv01946
Plaintiff:
Hawthorne Industrial Products Inc.
Defendant:
M/V Indigo Spica (IMO No. 9708758), IMS Maritime SA, IMECS Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
TRANSATLANTICA COMMODITIES PTE LTD v. HANWIN SHIPPING LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv03348
Plaintiff:
TRANSATLANTICA COMMODITIES PTE LTD
Defendant:
HANWIN SHIPPING LIMITED
Garnishee:
MASTER OF MV INDIGO SPICA and THE MASTER OF THE M/V INDIGO SPICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Transatlantica Commodities Pte Ltd. v. Hanwin Shipping Limited et al
as 1:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Transatlantica Commodities Pte Ltd.
Defendant:
Hanwin Shipping Limited and Cargo Carried in Hold 5 of the M/V TAC IMOLA, consisting of approximately 3572.437 mt of plywood
Garnishee:
The Master of the M/V INDIGO SPICA, The Master of the M/V TAC IMOLA, Far East American, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Hawthorne Industrial Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Marine Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
