Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Gussin v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Dane Gussin
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bussey v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Royce Bussey
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Howell M. Estes, III, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01140
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Jeffrey R. Tarr, Howell M. Estes, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Assad v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shawn Little v. Gregory Hammond, et al
as 17-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY HAMMOND, 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WARREN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, ANDMORGAN C. THOMAS and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
EVA C. STROUP
ESTES v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv03223
Petitioner:
JESSE M. ESTES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LITTLE v. HAMMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND , 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , EVA C. STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2015cv01819
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hall
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, K Cooley, M Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2015cv01820
Plaintiff:
Alfred Harrison
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, K Cooley, M Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2015cv01758
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hall
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Geo Group Inc, Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
