Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reynolds v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Krystal Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Richard Gerganous and M. M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reynolds v. City of Raleigh et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Krystal Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Richard Gerganous and M. M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McClain v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
M. M. and Jency McClain
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
M. et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
M. M. and Jency McClain
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meister v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020ct03295
Defendant:
Warden D. Smith, C/M M. Swanagin, AM McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M&M Industrial Plumbing, Inc
as 5:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
M&M Industrial Plumbing, Inc
Defendant:
Mavcon Services of MI, LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
SEAY v. MITCHELL
as 1:2010cv00535
Petitioner:
HARRY RONALD SEAY
Respondent:
M. M. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
