Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kirk Loney v. Mark Sim
as 12-6568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity, UNKNOWN # 1, Officers, Fed. State and City, DREW, Captain, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, M. A. HARRISON, Officer, Badge #1925, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. v. Pickerill et al
as 3:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
August Pickerill , Robert Crady , Bryan Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirk Loney v. Douglas Wilder
as 10-7317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. v. Pickerill et al
as 1:2010cv01229
Plaintiff:
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
August Pickerill , Robert Crady , Bryan Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loney v. Wilder et al
as 3:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lee Loney
Defendant:
Douglas L. Wilder, Rodney Monroe, Mark Sims and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aero Bridgeworks, Inc. v. M. J. Harrison Leasing, Inc.
as 1:2007cv20820
Plaintiff:
Aero Bridgeworks, Inc., Aero Bridgeworks, Inc. and Aero Bridgeworks, Inc.
Defendant:
M. J. Harrison Leasing, Inc. and M. J. Harrison Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
