Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 20-3276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ROY ORMAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEESE and others
Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
J. Roy Ormand, Ian Connors, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parks v. Argueta et al
as 1:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
S. Argueta, T. Crawford, J. Oldt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Condit v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Condit
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bradford Condit v. Marilyn McKeithan
as 11-41305
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MARILYN MCKEITHAN
Appellant:
BRADFORD M CONDIT
Appellee:
MARILYN MCKEITHAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00306
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Baskin-Robbins Incorporated, et al v. Chad Condit, et al
as 09-15232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BASKIN-ROBBINS INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation and BASKIN-ROBBINS USA, CO., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
CHAD M. CONDIT
Defendant:
ACORN LANE ARIZONA, INC., an Arizona corporation, GARY A. CONDIT, CAROLYN P. CONDIT and others
Gray et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2007cv05693
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Gray, Paul E. Gray, Paul E. Gray and others
Defendant:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
