Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Darr v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2026cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Darr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Isiah Roten v. R. Cristini, et al
as 26-3086
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, DANIEL COULEHAN and others
Darr Law Offices et al v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01057
Plaintiff:
Darr Law Offices and Krystal Chamberlain
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Katch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Darr v. Unwell Products LLC
as 8:2026cv01961
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Unwell Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caitlin Darr v. Better Than Good Foods LLC
as 8:2026cv01774
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Better Than Good Foods LLC doing business as Schoolyard Snacks
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Caitlin Darr v. Rhythm USA LLC
as 8:2026cv01389
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Rhythm USA LLC doing business as Rhythm Livin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Caitlin Darr v. Sweat Equity Group LLC
as 8:2026cv01390
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Sweat Equity Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Caitlin Darr v. Edikted LLC
as 8:2026cv01336
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Edikted LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Caitlin Darr et al v. Grey Bandit LLC
as 8:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Grey Bandit LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
