Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Floyd et al v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Nicole M. Floyd and Temitope Ogunwumiju
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Nathaniel Perk, Susan Wybenga and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act - Liability
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv10416
Plaintiff:
Rico Menefee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, M. Floyd and others
TOLER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L TOLER, JR
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S PAYNE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zane Floyd v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General
GRIFFIS v. JMFA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JOHN M. FLOYD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
JAMES F GRIFFIS and JAMES F. GRIFFIS
Defendant:
JMFA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JOHN M. FLOYD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zane Floyd v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 21-16134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections;, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director of Operations, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Defendant:
ISHAN AZZAM, Chief Medical Officer
Not Classified By Court:
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC.
Floyd v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Linda Fox, Execution Team Members NDOC, David Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Zane M. Floyd
Interested Party:
Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
