Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lyle Heyward v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 22-3781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, in their individual capacity, CHRIS LAMBERT, in their individual capacity, JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, in their individual capacity and others
Giddens v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn M Giddens
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Heyward et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02499
Defendant:
Ibrahim Abdulrahim Al-Hagg, Dr. B. Potts, K. Riehle and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Cooper, Mathew May, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
Edward T. Shelton, Carder Denise, M. Gidden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02798
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Edward T. Shelton, Carder Denise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddens v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12190
Plaintiff:
Kathy M. Giddens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. City Of New York ;
as 1:2015cv04543
Plaintiff:
Edith Robinson , Baffour Adjei , Jeannette Almodovar and others
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
ADAMS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80045
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. GIDDENS, JR.
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Needham M. Giddens v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-71557
Plaintiff:
Needham M. Giddens
Defendant:
Abco Industries, Inc
GIDDENS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71557
Plaintiff:
NEEDHAM M. GIDDENS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
