Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Barron K. Simmons v. B. Arreguin et al
as 2:2023cv02777
Plaintiff:
Barron K Simmons and Barron Keith Simmons
Defendant:
B. Arreguin, M. Guzman, Warden R.C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Diez v. Hecht et al
as 1:2020cv01096
Defendant:
Jane N. Bland, J. Brett Busby, Scott Walker and others
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cohea v. Davey et al
as 1:2019cv01281
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, Dave Davey, I Bueno and others
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lipsey v. M. Guzman
as 18-16506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. GUZMAN, Psych Tech at Corcoran State Prison
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 2:2018cv01918
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 1:2018cv00955
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. Guzman
as 1:2017cv00896
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSADO-PEREZ v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC
as 4:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ROSADO-PEREZ
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L CARRERO-RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv01002
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TIM A. GROGG, COMMISSIONER BRUCE LEMMONS and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
FELIX M. GUZMAN and ALVINO PIZANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUZMAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv00545
Respondent:
K. BUTTS
Petitioner:
FELIX M. GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
