Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Southwood v. The Credit Card Solution et al
as 7:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Sharon Southwood
Defendant:
The Credit Card Solution, CCDN, LLC, R.K. Lock & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Larry v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2008cv00587
Plaintiff:
Orlando Larry
Defendant:
City of Madison, DANE COUNTY, Matthew Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick et al v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 2:2008cv02538
Defendant:
Tereser A Banks, Tereser A Banks, L Block and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick and Roe Rayborn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Felisa M. Lindsey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and The IBM Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick et al v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv03838
Plaintiff:
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick and Roe Rayborn
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Janet Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Lindsey v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
Fornia M. Lindsey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lindsey v. The Bank of New York
as 3:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
Haru M Lindsey
Defendant:
The Bank of New York, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., United Pacific Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lindsey v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
as 1:2007cv00308
Plaintiff:
Annette M. Lindsey
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
