Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Noe v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Noe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lackie v. Noe et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lackie
Defendant:
Eric M Noe, United States Army Corps of Engineers and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Russellville Legends LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-1778
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric M. Noe, Colonel, District Engineer, Little Rock District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock Division and United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Russellville Legends LLC
Russellville Legends LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv00524
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Eric M Noe and USA
Plaintiff:
Russellville Legends LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mondonedo v. Henderson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2012cv03082
Plaintiff:
Ralf M. Mondonedo
Defendant:
Keith C. Henderson and Tiffany M. Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mondonedo v. Roberts et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2012cv03045
Plaintiff:
Ralf M. Mondonedo
Defendant:
Ray Roberts and Tiffany M. Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.