Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodrigues v. United States Probation
as 0:2020cv00584
Respondent:
United States Probation
Petitioner:
Jessie M. Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barboza v. Rodrigues et al
as 6:2019cv01438
Defendant:
Gilson M. Rodrigues and Gilson's International Cuisine, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Henrique Barboza
Marinho Barboza v. Rodrigues et al
as 6:2019cv01439
Defendant:
GMR International Cuisine, Inc., Gilson M. Rodrigues, Gilson's International Cuisine, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Henrique Barboza and Alvaro HenriqueDeLima Marinho Barboza
Barboza v. Gilson's Brazilian Resturant et al
as 6:2019cv01437
Defendant:
GMR International Cuisine, Inc., Gilson's Brazilian Resturant and Gilson M. Rodrigues
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Henrique Barboza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oliveira v. Rodrigues et al
as 6:2019cv00334
Defendant:
GMR International Cuisine, Inc., Gilson's International Cuisine, Inc. and Gilson M. Rodrigues
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Antunes Oliveira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
(PC) Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
M. Rodrigues, A Williams, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 3:2018cv01484
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
M. Rodrigues, A Williams, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 1:2018cv03057
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Stuart Sherman, A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dick v. Rodrigues et al
as 6:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dick
Defendant:
Gilson M. Rodrigues and Gilson's International Cuisine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RODRIGUES v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
as 3:2014cv01578
Plaintiff:
KRISTY M. RODRIGUES
Defendant:
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
