Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Scott v. Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV et al
as 3:2018cv01782
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Scott
Defendant:
Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCOTT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05974
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD M. SCOTT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRADOS v. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. GRADOS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA, SCOTT FERGUS, WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06916
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M SCOTT, JR and DARCY SCOTT
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PILLOW et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
FRANK PILLOW , PERRY HARNETT and TONY M. SCOTT
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SLOAN v. COUTTS et al
as 3:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
R. COUTTS, J. J. SOSSON, T. FULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68349
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOYD v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37130
Plaintiff:
M SCOTT BOYD
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 5:2011cv39770
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT
Petitioner:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 5:2011cv39769
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
