Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Bashum v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bashum
Defendant:
Keenan M Smith, Brittany Greene, Kimberly Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10243
Plaintiff:
Helen M. Smith
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, LOreal USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Eddings et al
as 3:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Smith
Defendant:
Dale Eddings, Richard Phillips, Kenny Benzing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
Dottie M. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. Meyers et al
as 3:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Defendant:
Percy Meyers, Sabrina Stevens, Tammy Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Terry Grissom, Penny George, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Grissom et al
as 3:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Terry Grissom, Connie Houston, Kess Roberson and others
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Terry Grissom, Connie Houston, Penny George and others
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Joliet a municipal corporation
as 1:2020cv05387
Plaintiff:
Jamal M Smith
Defendant:
CITY OF JOLIET, a municipal corporation, Unknown Joliet Police Officers and City of Joliet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
