Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Akinbayo
as 1:2022cv01432
Petitioner:
David M. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Kolawole Akinbayo and Attorney General Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMPSON v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2022cv03840
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SIMPSON
Defendant:
PETER M. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv16687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Saunders v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Saunders
Defendant:
Alphonso Turner, John W. Lester Williams, Carl Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01134
Petitioner:
David M. Williams
Respondent:
Robert May and Attorney General for the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
