Cases 1 - 10 of 26
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. WILLIAMS, MOSES R. JENKINS and Moses R. Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. USA
as 3:2021cv00084
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lavon M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kirk v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00675
Defendant:
Jane Doe, City of Charlotte, William Todd Walther and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdullah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohr, Jr et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sooner Ventures LLC, Timothy Hill, Tonja Vaughn and others
Defendant:
E.I. duPont Chemical Corporation, Michael E Johnson, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Blue World Pools, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00001
Plaintiff:
Terry M Williams and Terry M. Williams
Defendant:
Blue World Pools, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Blue World Pools, Inc., a Georgia corporation and Blue World Pools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Stein
as 1:2018cv00345
Petitioner:
MICHAEL M. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOSH STEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Stein
as 5:2018hc02108
Petitioner:
Michael M. Williams
Respondent:
Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. USA
as 3:2018cv00145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lavon M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
