Cases 1 - 10 of 390
McCormick et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Rachel McCormick and M.J.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colvin v. M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.
as 24-2082
Plaintiff:
PARNELL COLVIN
Defendant:
M.J. DEAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp v. Younis et al
as 9:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Peter Rupp
Defendant:
ASAT M.J. Younis, SGT R.B. Howard, SGT Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laura Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua C. Devine, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M.J. Crane, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
