Cases 1 - 10 of 23
David Meyers v. VDOC
as 26-6158
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KYLE ROSCH, Interstate Compact Administrator, MACK BAILEY, Lunenburg Correctional Center Warden and others
David Meyers v. Kyle Rosch
as 26-6155
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator, CHADWICK DOTSON, VADOC Director, JOSEPH WALTERS, VADOC Director and others
Cooper v. Bailey et al
as 2:2026cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Mack Bailey and VA Department C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bird v. Bailey, et al.
as 1:2026cv00114
Plaintiff:
Troy Bird
Defendant:
Mack Bailey, Alecia F. Crawley, Serenity Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. doc VA At NCC et al
as 7:2025cv00927
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
doc VA At NCC and Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russo v. Bailey et al
as 3:2025cv00746
Plaintiff:
Frank Russo
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, Mack Bailey, Dylan Pahe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Raynor, Sr. v. Mack Bailey, Jr.
as 25-6589
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERMAN RAYNOR
Defendant:
MACK BAILEY, Warden of Lunenburg Correctional Center, CHADWICK DOTSON, Virginia Department of Corrections Director and GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia
Estes v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2025cv00061
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, The Faith Review Committee of VADOC, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00711
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, Virginia Department of Corrections, Wendy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
