Cases 1 - 5 of 5
BATTLE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MACK BATTLE, JR
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SOMERSET COUNTY, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Roberts v. Nicholas
as 07-1472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN NICHOLAS, Commissioner Maine Department of Health and Human Services, and individually, PETER WALSH, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Health and Human Services, KEVIN W. CONCANNON, individually and in his official capacity as Commisioner (former) of Maine Department of Human Services and others
Pharm Rsrch Mftr v. Thompson, Tommy G., et al
as 02-5110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Tommy G. Thompson, in his official capacity as, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Thomas A. Scully, In His Official Capacity As, Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin C. Concannon, Commissioner of the Maine Department of Human Services, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Association of Retired Persons
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Legal Foundation, Seniors Coalition, (TSC) and 60-Plus Association
PHARM RESEARCH V MAINE DEPT HUM SVC
as 01-1597
Defendant-Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MAINE and COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Movant-Appellant:
EDWIN D. SCHINDLER
Plaintiff-Appellee:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
SCHINDLER V GOVERNOR OF MAINE
as 01-1579
Defendant-Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MAINE, COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EDWIN D. SCHINDLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
