Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Maldonado v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Osman Giovanni Acosta Maldonado
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Hugo Maldonado Ortiz
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maldonado v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02096
Petitioner:
Allan Glymar Maldonado
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Hugo Maldonado Ortiz
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maldonado v. Ronne
as 5:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Carlos Juan Maldonado
Respondent:
Warden Ronne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MALDONADO v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
COREY F. MALDONADO
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallinan et al v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020hc02088
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Maldonado, Anthony Butler, Troy A. Titus and others
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Thomas Scarantino and Jeffrey Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maldonado-Reynolds v. NC Correctional Institute for Women
as 5:2015hc02263
Petitioner:
Danielle Star Maldonado-Reynolds
Respondent:
NC Correctional Institute for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burton v. Maldonado
as 3:2015cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Respondent:
Rene Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maldonado v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 0:2014cv00022
Petitioner:
Alejandro Maldonado
Respondent:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
