Cases 41 - 50 of 266
MALDONADO et al v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv04255
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO, CORRY BROOKS, ETHAN ANTHONY CHIN and others
Defendant:
CHERL STEBERGER, TONI WARFEL and JUSTIN HACKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: MALDONADO
as 2:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LAMAR MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Nassau Correctional Dept.
as 2:2023cv07883
Plaintiff:
Junior Maldonado
Defendant:
Nassau Correctional Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibbison v. Scagliarni et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Scagliarni, Swol, Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. RANKIN
as 5:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
DEPUTY SHERRIFF RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neil Rudolph
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv03511
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
CHERL STEBERGER and MEGAN KREIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
