Cases 41 - 50 of 399
Dent v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv03675
Plaintiff:
Michael Delvon Dent
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Thomas J. Dart, Sczerba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam Malone Hot Wheel LLC et al v. Asap Trans Corp
as 1:2022cv03572
Plaintiff:
Sam Malone Hot Wheel LLC and Zahidullah Rahmati
Defendant:
Asap Trans Corp
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Lane v. Village of Dolton Police Department, The et al
as 1:2022cv02735
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Lane
Defendant:
Village of Dolton Police Department, The, Officer Malone and Other Officer Name Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Dixon Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02165
Plaintiff:
Deondra Malone
Defendant:
Dixon Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Malone v. Ivers et al
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
L Ivers, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIGGS et al v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 3:2022cv00019
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Petitioner:
AARON L. RIGGS, JONATHAN M. CARROLL, JASON L. CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Interflex Acquisition Company LLC
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ryan Malone
Defendant:
Interflex Acquisition Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Malone v. Headco Industries, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Steven Malone
Defendant:
Headco Industries, Inc.
MALONE v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
CHAD MALONE
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
