Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Ward-Malone v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00097
Petitioner:
Christopher J Ward-Malone
Respondent:
Chris Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scavelli v. Mercer et al
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Justin Mercer, Katheryne Gonzalez, Cody T Norton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scavelli, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Walker et al
as 4:2020cv00542
Defendant:
Unknown Quesada, Unknown Sterling, Unknown Arriero and others
Plaintiff:
Coty Travis Waters
Petitioner:
Jimmy David Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinson et al v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00237
Petitioner:
Jimmy Malone, Jonah Garza, Edwin Wike and others
Respondent:
Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scottsdale Indemnity Company v. Axcess Recovery USA LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00744
Defendant:
Jason Malone, Unknown Nunez, Joseph J Dohnalek and others
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone-Dixon et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04885
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Malone-Dixon and Reginald Dixon
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04876
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karam v. University of Arizona et al
as 4:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Suzanne Toyama-Bodnar, David Lee, Thao Truong and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Karam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malone v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
Patricia Malone
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Queen Malone
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
