Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Kaur (Jasminder Singh)
as 23-8038
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAJPREET KAUR and MANDEEP SINGH
Defendant / Appellant:
JASMINDER SINGH
White v. Indemnity Insurance Co of North America et al
as 6:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Kayla White
Defendant:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Mohinder Singh, Inc. d/b/a California Transport, Mandeep Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Singh
as 23-6275
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAJPREET KAUR and MANDEEP SINGH
Defendant / Appellant:
JASMINDER SINGH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Segeada v. Singh et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
ESPERANZA SEGEADA
Defendant:
MANDEEP SINGH and ABJ HAULER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Singh v. Garland
as 21-6223
Petitioner:
MANDEEP SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv07576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Garland
as 20-2818
Petitioner:
Mandeep Singh
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Attorney General and Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
