Cases 11 - 20 of 129
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES, LLC et al v. FALLON COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN, INC. ET AL
as 2:2023cv02354
Petitioner:
Fallon Community Health Plan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC and MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Caring Voice Coalition, Inc.
as 22-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, MSPA CLAIMS 1 LLC, a Florida limited liability company, SERIES PMPI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARING VOICE COALITION, INC. and UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES, LLC et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES, LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, SERIES PMPI and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, SERIES PMPI and others
Not Classified By Court:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS PROV, SERIES LLC
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., ADVANCED CARE SCRIPTS and PATIENT ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, et al v. Mercury General
as 21-56395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, a Delaware entity, MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES LLC, a Delaware entity and MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, a Florida entity
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCURY GENERAL, a California company, its subsidiaries and affiliates
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, et al v. Mercury General
as 21-56396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, a Delaware entity, MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES LLC, a Delaware entity and MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, a Florida entity
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCURY GENERAL, a California company, its subsidiaries and affiliates
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC et al v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv20451
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, SERIES PMPI, A SEGREGATED SERIES OF MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC and others
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LL v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America
as 21-2745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, Series PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company and MSPA Claims I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation, FKA Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a Delaware profit corporation and others
Defendant:
Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
MSP Recovery Claims, Series L, et al v. Metropolitan General Insurance, et al
as 21-11547
Defendant / Appellee:
METLIFE AUTO & HOME GROUP, METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC and MAO-MSO RECOVERY II LLC, SERIES PMPI
MSP Recovery Claims Series, LLC et al v. National Continental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series PMPI, MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and others
Defendant:
Progressive American Insurance Company, National Continental Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Not Classified By Court:
Scott J. Silverman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
