Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Cooney v. Knuckles et al
as 4:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles, Carl Boyce, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Marcus Oneil Laquient Owens and Mark
Defendant:
Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Bank of America NA
as 4:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Marcus Thompson
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Elder v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett Elder
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellebrew v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Kellebrew
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Radford v. Graham et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Franklin Graham, Tyrone Allison, Marcus Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05174
Plaintiff:
Marcus Da'Ron Ford
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Governor Sarah Huckabee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
