Cases 1 - 10 of 196
SMITH v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peck v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Marcus LaShawn Peck
Defendant:
William J Nelson and Marion County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAIL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
SARA VAIL
Defendant:
MARCUS ADAMS and MAG CARRIERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mayberry v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benyoun v. East Chicago IN City of et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marcus C. Benyoun and Marcus C Benyoun
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, IN, Louis Gonzalez, Adam Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROADWAY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
MARCUS BROADWAY
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
