Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
Maria Cardoso de Flores v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60744
Petitioner:
MARIA SYLVIA CARDOSO DE FLORES, also known as Maria Flores
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
FLORES v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv06268
Plaintiff:
MARIA FLORES
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JHP Properties, Inc. v. Blandon et al
as 2:2017cv06025
Defendant:
Maria V. Blandon, Does, Jose Flores and others
Plaintiff:
JHP Properties, Inc.
Maria Flores v. USA, et al
as 17-56120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA FLORES, by and through her guardian Josie Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES, 1-20, inclusive
Diaz-Rivera v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01925
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Diaz-Rivera
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Hector J. Vazquez-Santiesteban, Yaritza Carrasquillo-Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01090
Plaintiff:
Maria Flores
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juaquin Umana Martinez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73370
Petitioner:
JUAQUIN UMANA MARTINEZ, AKA Jose Flores, AKA Jose Maria Flores, AKA Jose Maria Flores Orellana
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Keassons Inc / Keassons Transport et al
as 3:2016cv02762
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Keassons Inc / Keassons Transport, Lucio Lobo and Maria Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
