Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gomes-Fernandes et al v. Gomes-Fernandes et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Plaintiff:
Luis Anibal Gomes-Fernandes, Karol Sabrina Gomes, Carolina Maria Gomes-Fernandes and others
Defendant:
Sergio David Gomes-Fernandes, Juan Guillermo Herrans-Barrera and Sandy Feet Development Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomes-Fernandes, et al v. Gomes-Fernandes
as 19-1293
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO DAVID GOMES-FERNANDES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAROL SABRINA GOMES, CAROLINA MARIA GOMES-FERNANDES, ESTATE OF VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDES DA SILVA and others
Gomes-Fernandes et al v. Gomes-Fernandes
as 3:2018cv01176
Plaintiff:
Luis Anibal Gomes-Fernandes , Karol Sabrina Gomes , Estate of Victor Manuel Fernandes da Silva and others
Defendant:
Sergio David Gomes-Fernandes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DONAHUE et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as PAE/2:16-cv-03710
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL DONAHUE , BRIANA DONG , BELINDA DRIVER and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
DONAHUE et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03710
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL DONAHUE , BRIANA DONG , BELINDA DRIVER and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
KEAHL v. FLOURNOY et al
as 4:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH S KEAHL
Defendant:
J V FLOURNOY, JOSE ROBERTO MENDOZA, EFREN CARBONELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Albert Gomes v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-1403
Petitioner:
ALBERT JAMES GOMES, ARLENE MARIA GOMES and AMELIA JULIA GOMES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. G1540 Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC , DD IP Holder LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
G1540 Corporation, Semog Foods, Inc. and Maria Gomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
