Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cassidy et al v. 3M Company et al.
as 2:2025cv02699
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Pete J Cassidy, Agustine Ramirez Aguilar, Anthony Edward Alanis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Cassidy et al v. 3M Company et al.
as 2:2025cv00244
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Pete J Cassidy, Agustine Ramirez Aguilar, Anthony Edward Alanis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cassidy et al v. 3M Company et al.
as ALN/2:25-cv-00244
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Pete J Cassidy, Agustine Ramirez Aguilar, Anthony Edward Alanis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
FLORES et al v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2024cv03133
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
Mario Flores Rodriguez and SANDRA Y. FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chantaf v. MG Transport LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Samir El Chantaf
Defendant:
Mario Flores and MG Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
USA v. Flores
as 22-40448
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Flores
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
