Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bulthouse v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, John Doe, Jamal Lane and others
Plaintiff:
John Bulthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Alger, Sr. v. Muskegon County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 16-2428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA LEVI ALGER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Sheriff Deputies, Medical Staff, Mental Health Staff, MARK BURNS, Lt. Sheriff Deputy, DAVID LOPEZ, Head Nurse and others
Gamble v. Muskegon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
Bobby Derrick Gamble
Defendant:
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department, Dean Roseler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jody Lynn Ferguson
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Parris
as 1:2016cv01002
Petitioner:
Mark Burns
Defendant:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alger #376096 v. Muskegon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alger #376096
Defendant:
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department , Dean Roseler , Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Semelbauer et al v. Muskegon, County et al
as 1:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Michelle Semelbauer , Paulette Bosch , Denise Vos and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basham v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2014cv00303
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler and Mark Burns
Plaintiff:
James Basham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Carl
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of , Mark Burns , Todd Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Hardy v. George Jurkas, et al
as 09-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN O. HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE JURKAS and MARK BURNS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
