Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BUSHANSKY v. OYSTER POINT PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv07212
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
OYSTER POINT PHARMA, INC., JEFFREY NAU, MICHAEL G. ATIEH and others
Kent v. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., Donald J. Santel, Jeffrey Nau and others
CROWDER v. OYSTER POINT PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv07025
Plaintiff:
CODY CROWDER
Defendant:
OYSTER POINT PHARMA, INC., DONALD J. SANTEL, JEFFREY NAU and others
WILSON v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv02406
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILSON
Defendant:
JULIO M. ALGARIN, SEAN P. MCGEE, MARKS. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dysart et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv08564
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Dysart , Kay Lorraine Johnston , Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Justin Credico v. David Sprague, et al
as 15-2434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SPRAGUE, JOE MILLIGAN, JIM FITZGERALD and others
Justin Credico v. USA, et al
as 13-1330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION COMMISSION, WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY and others
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION COMMISSION, WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. SPRAGUE et al
as 2:2010cv05414
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
DAVID SPRAGUE, JOE MILLIGAN, JIM FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MILLIGAN et al
as 2:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
JOE MILLIGAN, JIM FITSGERALD, MATTHEW BRICKETTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
