Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wood et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08044
Plaintiff:
Mark Wood, Anthony Donisi, Gary Byington and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Adam Russell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Wood et al
as 8:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Autumn Corp. and Mark Wood
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company as subrogee of Ticonderoga Golf Corp., d/b/a Ticonderoga Country Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., David Stuart, John Temples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elleby v. DeRose et al
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Taye Elleby
Defendant:
M. DeRose, Jane Doe, Mark Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv00232
Defendant:
Backpage.com, LLC, Capital One, N.A., Giancarlo Cavallo and others
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01417
Plaintiff:
Mark Woods
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Department of Correction, Correctional Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv00819
Plaintiff:
Mark Woods
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Department of Correction, Correctional Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
