Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martin v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Martin
Defendant:
United States of America and Victor Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05998
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question - Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05956
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Lawton v. Apex Trader Funding Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv02078
Plaintiff:
Steven Lawton
Defendant:
Apex Trader Funding Inc., Darrell Roland Martin and John Mark Skelton
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
LONGORIA et al v. OF AMERICA; et al
as 5:2026cv04149
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO LONGORIA, JONATHAN LONGORIA and MARTIN DANIEL RASCON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;, P. K., W. W. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Glenn v. Martin et al
as 1:2026cv25002
Plaintiff:
Stoney Glenn
Defendant:
Sergeant Martin, Leslie Guadalupe Vieira and R Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
