Cases
Bean v. Cuyahoga County, et al.
as 1:2019cv01000
Defendant: Catherine Clark, Cuyahoga County, Kenneth Mills and others
Plaintiff: De'Von Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Sanofi US Services Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv02192
Plaintiff: Mary J Hancock
Defendant: Accord Healthcare, Inc., Hospira, Inc., Sun Pharma Global FZE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12329
Plaintiff: MARY A. HANCOCK
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agbimson v. Handy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv09252
Plaintiff: Eugene Agbimson
Defendant: Carlos Handy and Mary Jane Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones-Hancock v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02475
Plaintiff: Mary Jones-Hancock
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandenburg Health Facilities, et al v. Ivye Mattingly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6168
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANDENBURG HEALTH FACILITIES, LP, dba Brandenburg Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, PREFERRED CARE, INC. and KENTUCKY PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: IVYE MATTINGLY, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Jo Hancock, an Incapacitated Person
Unmasking et al v. Stiviano et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Respondent: Jonathan Stiviano, Arizona Department of Corrections and Benjamin Lanza
Petitioner: Stephen A Unmasking, Edward Klebold, Jimmy Theola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mary Hancock v. Pulaski SP Warden
as 12-11424
Petitioner - Appellant: MARY ANGELA HANCOCK, a.k.a. Merry Angela Hancock
Respondent - Appellee: PULASKI SP WARDEN
Hancock v. Chapman Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00104
Petitioner: Mary Angela Hancock
Respondent: Tom Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?