Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sarrah Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell, Sarrah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
T. v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2019cv00407
Defendant:
Betty Siegel, Does 1 through 20,, County of San Diego and others
Plaintiff:
T. T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Waddell et al
as 2:2018cv10473
Petitioner:
Virginia Marie Dean, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Southern California IBEW-NECA Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Billy Edwin Waddell v. Southern California IBEW-NECA Trust Fund et al
as 2:2018cv10476
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Ms. Virginia marie Dean, Southern California IBEW-NECA Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Edwin Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dean et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01299
Plaintiff:
John Dean and Mary Dean
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean et al v. Great American Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv05047
Plaintiff:
Frank Dean and Mary Dean
Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael McCall, et al v. Intercity Transit, et al
as 11-35602
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCALL
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERCITY TRANSIT, EVE JOHNSON, MARTIN THIES and others
Michael McCall v. Intercity Transit, et al
as 11-35182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCALL
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERCITY TRANSIT, EVE JOHNSON, MARTIN THIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCall et al v. Intercity Transit et al
as 3:2010cv05564
Plaintiff:
Michael McCall and Arthur West
Defendant:
Intercity Transit , Eve Johnson , Martin Thies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
