Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Darlene Jordan et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jordan , Yvonne Esquivel , Evanetta Evans and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darlene Jordan et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01928
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jordan , Yvonne Esquivel , Evanetta Evans and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Darlene Jordan et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01928
Plaintiff:
Mary Armstrong, Wilihmena Arnold, Mable Beamon and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
McBride v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv02603
Plaintiff:
Mary McBride
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
McBride v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie McBride
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCBRIDE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01634
Plaintiff:
MARY MCBRIDE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zimerman v. McBride
as 2:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Alex Zimerman
Defendant:
Mary McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Alex Zimerman
Defendant:
Mary McBride
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MCBRIDE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
MARY MCBRIDE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Neptune Plumbing Company
as 2:2010cv05874
Defendant:
Daniel Lee McBride, Tara Marie McBride and Neptune Plumbing Company
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
