Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MCCREEDY-DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68806
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCCREEDY-DANIELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Apex Bank, et al v. Bettis Rainsford, Sr.
as 21-6238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APEX BANK, MATTHEW D. DANIELS and BRAD HAILEY
Defendant / Appellant:
BETTIS C. RAINSFORD, SR.
Rose v. Garland
as 21-6498
Petitioner:
MATTHEW O DANIEL ROSE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Daniels et al
as 0:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Beverly J. Reyes Daniels, Beverly J. Reyes, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Matthew W. Daniel v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv04797
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Apex Bank et al v. Rainsford
as 3:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brad Hailey, Apex Bank and Matthew D. Daniels
Defendant:
Bettis Rainsford and Bettis C Rainsford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Apex Bank et al v. Rainsford
as 3:2019cv00130
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Daniels, Apex Bank and Brad Hailey
Defendant:
Bettis C Rainsford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Daniels v. Casey Cleaver, et al
as 19-35231
Defendant / Appellee:
CASEY CLEAVER, RHONDA GORE, STEPHEN COOK and others
Defendant:
TAMMY GREINER, C. CLEMENTS, COLLETTE PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN DANIELS
Coffelt et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coffelt, Wayne D Merkley and Matthew S Daniels
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Director of Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Cory Claus, Casey Cleaver, C. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
