Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. LA State Police
as 24-30093
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana State Police and New Orleans Police Department
Jones v. MS Hwy Patrol
as 24-60065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi Highway Patrol and Jackson Police Department
Jones v. Orange Texas PD
as 24-40070
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Orange Texas Police Department, Jasper Police Department and Texas Highway Patrol
Jones v. Louisiana State Police et al
as 2:2023cv07258
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana State Police and New Orleans Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Orange Texas Police Department et al *** ***
as 6:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Orange Texas Police Department, Jasper Police Department and Texas Highway Patrol, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Orange Texas Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Orange Texas Police Department, Jasper Police Department and Texas Highway Patrol, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Mississippi Highway Patrol et al
as 3:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi Highway Patrol and Jackson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. King
as 23-50850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant / Appellant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Jones et al v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. City of El Paso et al
as 3:2009cv00236
Plaintiff:
Debra Powers and Debra Powers
Defendant:
City of El Paso, Gregory Allen and Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
