Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff: Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06290
Defendant: BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. and BI-LO HOLDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RELIABLE PHARMACY et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO US, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06044
Defendant: BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., PLIVA, INC., GREENSTONE LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHET JOHNSON DRUG, FALCONER PHARMACY, RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01167
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff: Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd. and Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00923
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff: Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Harel Pension and Provident Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00656
Plaintiff: Harel Insurance Company Ltd., Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd., Icic - Israel Credit Insurance Company Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sigurdur Olafsson, Maureen Cavanaugh and others
Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd., et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2019cv00449
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson and others
Plaintiff: Phoenix Pension Ltd., Excellence Gemel & Hishtalmut Ltd., Excellence Mutual Funds and others
Migdal Insurance Company LTD et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 3:2019cv00655
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Maureen Cavanaugh and others
Plaintiff: Yozma Pension Fund of Self Employed LTD, Altshuler Shaham Mutual Funds Management LTD., Provident Fund of the Employees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?