Cases 11 - 20 of 1,013
IN RE:CHAMBERS, SR.
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS and MAURICE CHAMBERS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McCartney et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lavon Cooper
Defendant:
Maureen McCartney, Christopher L. de Barrena - Sarobe, Jesse Wenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brayboy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Maurice Brayboy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Unit Manager Heenan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOGAN
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, BOROUGH OF COLWYN, MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barry-Gibbons v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Stephen Maurice Barry-Gibbons
Respondent:
Superintendent MICHAEL GOURLEY and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BRAYBOY v. GOVERNMENT JURISPRUDENCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2023cv04975
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT JURISPRUDENCE OFFICE, DARBY BOROUGH, LEXIS NEXIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
