Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Maurice v. Garland
as 21-1395
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ROOBENS MAURICE
US v. Rowe-Figueroa
as 21-1376
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE ROWE-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Mo, a/k/a Muri, a/k/a Muki
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Rowe-Figueroa
as 21-1262
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE ROWE-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Mo, a/k/a Muri, a/k/a Muki
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Montoya, et al v. CRST Expedited, Inc., et al
as 21-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN CARLOS MONTOYA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JEAN PAUL BRICAULT, JR., JOSE TORRES ROSADO and others
Interested Party:
CURTIS MARKSON
Defendant / Appellant:
CRST INTERNATIONAL, INC. and CRST EXPEDITED, INC.
US v. Diggins
as 20-2079
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
MAINE VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE DIGGINS
US v. Diggins
as 20-2078
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
MAINE VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE DIGGINS
Smith et al v CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11353
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres Rosado, Jean Paul Bricault Jr, Maurice Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The Ann Wigmore Foundation, Inc. et al v. The Sterling Foundation, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11150
Defendant:
Jessica Hatfield, William N. Ford, Sr., Reynold Greenleaf & Associates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Ann Wigmore Foundation, Inc. and Susan Lynn Lavendar Baran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SIROIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SIROIS, JR
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
