Cases 41 - 50 of 585
SHOATZ v. FARRELL
as 2:2022cv02165
Petitioner:
MAURICE SHOATZ
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHELLE FARRELL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FASSETT v. POPE FRANCIS OF VATICAN et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
MAURICE FASSETT
Defendant:
POPE FRANCIS OF VATICAN and PRESIDENT OF DC WHITE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIE v. STRATHMAN et al.
as 2:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
RODRICUS MAURICE GRIFFIE
Defendant:
ANGELA REED STRATHMAN and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goines v. F21 OPCO LLC
as 2:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
Maurice Goines
Defendant:
F21 OPCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bob v. Rivello et al
as 1:2021cv01987
Petitioner:
Gary Maurice Bob
Respondent:
Warden Rivello, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAVES v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv05113
Plaintiff:
MAURICE GRAVES
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
MS. KIMBERLY BROWN and KIMBERLY BROWN
Defendant:
MAYOR MAURICE CLARK, SR., OFFICER DONALD QUICK, OFFICER MICHAEL HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bemiss et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Roy Bemiss, Quinton Goodall, Maurice Joseph and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2021cv04413
Plaintiff:
MAURICE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
NEWSOME v. EDDY
as 2:2021cv04229
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSOME
Defendant:
R.N. MS. EDDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
