Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
DAVIS et al v. JANSSEN ORTHO LLC et al
as 2:2021cv11701
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Plaintiff: MAURICE DAVIS and LOIS DAVIS
In Re: ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2016cv00770
Petitioner: MAURICE DAVIS, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maurice Davi
as 16-1480
Petitioner: In re: MAURICE DAVIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVIS v. DAY et al
as 2:2015cv01594
Plaintiff: ROBERT MAURICE DAVIS
Defendant: DAY, KAMINSKY, CHRISTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Maurice Davis, Jr.
as 14-1466
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MAURICE DAVIS, JR.
Maurice Davis v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 13-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAURICE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL HARLOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
DAVIS v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv05411
Plaintiff: MAURICE DAVIS
Defendant: THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHELE FARRELL and GIORLA LOUIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2012cv04779
Petitioner: MAURICE DAVIS
Respondent: MICHAEL W. HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spotts et al v. Lindsey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00583
Plaintiff: Kelvin Andre Spotts, Broderick York, Roderick Wheless and others
Defendant: Lindsey, Compton, Marc Renda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05923
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?