Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
TRUMP v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00312
Defendant: PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF, MCCF SECURITTY OFFICERS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL DOCTORS AND NURSES and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALLEN TRUMP, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holpe v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant: Sgt Malone, Willie Smith and MTC-MCCF
Plaintiff: Leslie Holpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. MCCF
as 1:2018cv04026
Plaintiff: Vincent Deporres Young
Defendant: MCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Grimes v. Dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01658
Plaintiff: Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant: Karina Dixon, Montgomery County, District Court of Maryland, Traffic and Criminal Division, Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2017cv00078
Plaintiff: Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant: Unknown Jenkins , MDOC and MCCF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Mills v. Mark Bowen, et al
as 17-15989
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID RAY MILLS
Defendant - Appellee: MARK BOWEN, Warden, LE YOUNG, Doctor at Central Valley MCCF, GEO CORRECTIONS and others
GRACE v. MCCF et al
as 2:2016cv06656
Plaintiff: JEFF J. GRACE
Defendant: MCCF, COLLINS, ZERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Cannata v. Tamie Holt
as 16-56284
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY WYATT CANNATA
Respondent - Appellee: TAMIE HOLT, Warden, Taft MCCF
Alphonso L Brooks v. MCCF Golden State McFarland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01240
Petitioner: Alphonso L Brooks
Respondent: MCCF Golden State McFarland
Vaca v. Bowen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01327
Plaintiff: Marcos Vaca
Defendant: Bowen, Nadel, Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?