Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Slocumb v. McClelland et al
as 2:2021cv01912
Plaintiff:
Kysha Slocumb
Defendant:
Jason McClelland and Jeffrey Van Winkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01089
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Jeffrey Van Winkle, Charles Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Marcella Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2019cv05587
Plaintiff:
Rosemary McClelland, Denae Lossing, Shoshana Korrub and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eldridge #147718 v. Oswald et al
as 2:2018cv02557
Defendant:
Hayes Hall, Jason McClelland and Alfred Oswald
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClelland v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04405
Plaintiff:
Sarah D McClelland
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krieg v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2013cv00710
Cross Defendant:
Scott McClelland and New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brielle Cotterman, Richard Schwartz, NYLife Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Krieg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. McClelland et al
as 4:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Richard J McClelland, Jeffrey M McClelland, Norma McClelland and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
McClelland v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv00764
Petitioner:
Robert John McClelland
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClelland v. Graber
as 4:2010cv00148
Petitioner:
Ronald McClelland
Respondent:
Conrad M Graber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
