Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Hodges v. Rufus et al
as 3:2018cv01528
Defendant:
Child Youth Service, Freddie Rufus, Scranton Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCURDY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv11937
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE MCCURDY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCCURDY v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv00643
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. MCCURDY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
MCCURDY v. TICE et al
as 2:2017cv01443
Petitioner:
JOHN MCCURDY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hodges v. Child Youth Family Service Luzerne et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Defendant:
Child Youth Family Service Luzerne, Aaron McCurdy and Freddie Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCurdy v. USDA Rural Development
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
John M. McCurdy
Defendant:
USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCurdy v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv02436
Plaintiff:
Dana McCurdy
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chaiken et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04518
Plaintiff:
Irwin Chaiken , Carol Chaiken , Anna S Acosta and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jean Coulter v. Mary Ramsden, et al
as 13-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY S. RAMSDEN, STEPHANIE ANDERSON, RAPHAEL RAMSDEN & BEHERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
